This one took about 74.3× the usual for FIRO/QTUM. Waiting longer than usual is not in itself a failure: a swap waits on confirmations from both chains, and a slow block or a busy network stretches it.
The record stops at MakerPaymentSpendConfirmFailed. The taker's claim on the maker's coin was broadcast but not seen to confirm.
taker_swap:2052] !wait for maker payment spend confirmations: rpc_clients:119] Waited too long until 1785713839 for transaction to be confirmed 1 times
By this step both payments were on their chains and the price had been struck, so the trade counts toward the reference price. The claim can be retried for as long as the timelock holds, and whether it was is a question for the chain rather than for this log.
The chain says the claim landed: the payment was spent with the preimage, in 34338544a938e309138a20c196dbfe4a5e343d44317fbf0a1901360a2cb3d27b. Checked 2026-09-22 12:36:54 UTC.
396b858dcdc40f2e4b3b3c30fa327f83b75a3d6e674d1623487966122a66c58d
Both payments are on their chains and locked to the same secret hash 34624c9454759c37be3cb636a20f33186de187f4, and a preimage hashing to it was published on chain when one side claimed.
- MakerPaymentSent · 396b858dcdc40f2e4b3b3c30fa327f83b75a3d6e674d1623487966122a66c58d
9301d6bf0a118a544834a870257dd54c61b9848b1587adfb1ed1b1a4121db115
Both payments are on their chains and locked to the same secret hash 34624c9454759c37be3cb636a20f33186de187f4, and a preimage hashing to it was published on chain when one side claimed.
- TakerFeeValidated · 48a1a0cb982832c0536f792e9fa593ccf6ca35f462b259a253d73062e63e3f24
- TakerPaymentReceived · 9301d6bf0a118a544834a870257dd54c61b9848b1587adfb1ed1b1a4121db115
- TakerPaymentSpent · ad11a568ef0d82fda4009a1e74897cc646e8775f147f8aa4d09e4431ed241084
No anomalies were recorded against this swap.
Reported by defistats-gleec.