An atomic swap is not instant by design. Each side has to publish a transaction and wait for the other chain to confirm it, so the time it takes is set mostly by the block spacing of the two chains involved rather than by anything either party does.
The record stops at MakerPaymentSpendFailed. The taker's claim on the maker's coin was rejected; it can be retried for as long as that payment is unspent.
taker_swap:1803] utxo_common:2035] HTLC spend fee 10000000 is greater than transaction output 2787675
By this step both payments were on their chains and the price had been struck, so the trade counts toward the reference price. The claim can be retried for as long as the payment is unspent, and until the timelock passes nobody else can touch it. Whether it was retried is a question for the chain rather than for this log.
The chain shows the maker's payment still sitting in its contract: neither claimed nor refunded. The maker had already collected the taker's payment by this step, so the taker paid and has not received the maker's coin. The secret is public, so the taker's claim can still be made; the maker can take it back after the timelock. Checked 2026-11-06 05:15:34 UTC. It will be asked again.
Wondering whether this one is yours? SwapScope cannot tell you: the parties are salted hashes, so that nobody can test a key against this data, and that cuts both ways. Search this swap's uuid in your own wallet's swap history, or open the payment transaction above on a block explorer and see whether the address paying into it is one of yours.
d5971a381d4ea8d4aabe807d8e6c52e73bb6af4879609caad80ed24726448e29
Both payments are on their chains and locked to the same secret hash 345acf2604263ee80174b727f4214bab33a87591, and a preimage hashing to it was published on chain when one side claimed.
- MakerPaymentSent · MakerPaymentReceived: d5971a381d4ea8d4aabe807d8e6c52e73bb6af4879609caad80ed24726448e29
8a81b033f689d4ba1d8ffebf49f037e43ffe098bb3c51a861fc8a072ef47312a
Both payments are on their chains and locked to the same secret hash 345acf2604263ee80174b727f4214bab33a87591, and a preimage hashing to it was published on chain when one side claimed.
- TakerFeeSent · TakerFeeValidated: d72acc50bbad4d6b657bb2c75def1a8190ae91f02a60067336db4f5f232d0219
- TakerPaymentSent · TakerPaymentReceived: 8a81b033f689d4ba1d8ffebf49f037e43ffe098bb3c51a861fc8a072ef47312a
- TakerPaymentSpent: 2a4ff1de87c5fed99c3d85358e4a91903b9542475e72c128621345aaadaa7432
No flags are stored against this swap. Flags are written while a swap sits inside a live pricing window, so on an older swap their absence means it was never assessed rather than that it was assessed and found clean.
Reported by defistats-gleec.