That is in the normal range for LCC/LTC. The time a swap takes is set mostly by the block spacing of the two chains involved, so a pair with slow blocks is slow for everyone, every time.
The record stops at MakerPaymentSpendFailed. The taker's claim on the maker's coin was rejected; it can be retried for as long as that payment is unspent.
the transaction was rejected by network rules. 16: mandatory-script-verify-flag-failed (Script failed an OP_EQUALVERIFY operation)
By this step both payments were on their chains and the price had been struck, so the trade counts toward the reference price. The claim can be retried for as long as the payment is unspent, and until the timelock passes nobody else can touch it. Whether it was retried is a question for the chain rather than for this log.
The chain shows the maker's payment still sitting in its contract: neither claimed nor refunded. The maker had already collected the taker's payment by this step, so the taker paid and has not received the maker's coin. The secret is public, so the taker's claim can still be made; the maker can take it back after the timelock. Checked 2026-11-06 05:26:16 UTC. It will be asked again.
Wondering whether this one is yours? SwapScope cannot tell you: the parties are salted hashes, so that nobody can test a key against this data, and that cuts both ways. Search this swap's uuid in your own wallet's swap history, or open the payment transaction above on a block explorer and see whether the address paying into it is one of yours.
520e0faef8bc7c21ee1df4a7e8f410934191e55fa96a67bc32c514be9107d747
Both payments are on their chains and locked to the same secret hash bb7afdf53c236b5e50bf64c15cd67ab426d90357, and a preimage hashing to it was published on chain when one side claimed.
- MakerPaymentReceived · MakerPaymentSent: 520e0faef8bc7c21ee1df4a7e8f410934191e55fa96a67bc32c514be9107d747
9e1e40a9f2465aa298ac3bbc0eb74d6c7b290a926698b156a8e82b0f5ba573ca
Both payments are on their chains and locked to the same secret hash bb7afdf53c236b5e50bf64c15cd67ab426d90357, and a preimage hashing to it was published on chain when one side claimed.
- TakerFeeSent · TakerFeeValidated: 2b7cfdf39172a59d05515c37d8115f6f57555721214c5dfb1d2e5784dd9f6fa1
- TakerPaymentSent · TakerPaymentReceived: 9e1e40a9f2465aa298ac3bbc0eb74d6c7b290a926698b156a8e82b0f5ba573ca
- TakerPaymentSpent: 0041a915989a3b6dcb93633288fc6d30c7c36613afc0e50123ee53ef36ec7820
No flags are stored against this swap. Flags are written while a swap sits inside a live pricing window, so on an older swap their absence means it was never assessed rather than that it was assessed and found clean.
Reported by defistats-gleec.