This one took about 28.9× the usual for FIRO/BCH. Waiting longer than usual is not in itself a failure: a swap waits on confirmations from both chains, and a slow block or a busy network stretches it.
The record stops at MakerPaymentSpendConfirmFailed. The taker's claim on the maker's coin was broadcast but not seen to confirm.
taker_swap:2052] !wait for maker payment spend confirmations: rpc_clients:119] Waited too long until 1789778089 for transaction to be confirmed 1 times
By this step both payments were on their chains and the price had been struck, so the trade counts toward the reference price. The claim can be retried for as long as the timelock holds, and whether it was is a question for the chain rather than for this log.
The chain says the claim landed: the payment was spent with the preimage, in bac7440e27ed3cc7d10538a6c8c9b80e6eadcde262fe295edb2b9d53992faf35. Checked 2026-09-22 12:35:31 UTC.
59dc9819fd6b0be28a6a67eb9d228b87889413c1f119c5ce66b1036981b4de7e
Both payments are on their chains and locked to the same secret hash 10e0b4a9ecdfca11eec4e070683af097328a7fe3, and a preimage hashing to it was published on chain when one side claimed.
- MakerPaymentSent · 59dc9819fd6b0be28a6a67eb9d228b87889413c1f119c5ce66b1036981b4de7e
f8d91e5d7dfc4a10bc6caf7ec9d98e7c6d1e1ad512f84ae7582eb37176779750
Both payments are on their chains and locked to the same secret hash 10e0b4a9ecdfca11eec4e070683af097328a7fe3, and a preimage hashing to it was published on chain when one side claimed.
- TakerFeeValidated · 4b25d191f0dbcf98995e674911c34207090d22c19b131869872024b597a79849
- TakerPaymentReceived · f8d91e5d7dfc4a10bc6caf7ec9d98e7c6d1e1ad512f84ae7582eb37176779750
- TakerPaymentSpent · eb2fc28a88d599ed6e4872827c266a8790979a3789d7183b70cb2c1a317950a8
No anomalies were recorded against this swap.
Reported by defistats-gleec.