An atomic swap is not instant by design. Each side has to publish a transaction and wait for the other chain to confirm it, so the time it takes is set mostly by the block spacing of the two chains involved rather than by anything either party does.
The record stops at MakerPaymentSpendFailed. The taker's claim on the maker's coin was rejected; it can be retried for as long as that payment is unspent.
taker_swap:2008] "eth:2892] request MethodCall(MethodCall { jsonrpc: Some(V2), method: "eth_sendRawTransaction", params: Array([String("0xf9010a018405f5e10083014c0894edc5b89fe1f0382f9e4316069971d90a0951db3180b8a402ed292b901adfd2e3a842b19d5cbd204211a8c94d07901f54b40a147594335d12c061bf000000000000000…
By this step both payments were on their chains and the price had been struck, so the trade counts toward the reference price. The claim can still be made for as long as the payment is unspent, and since the timelock has passed the payer can take it back as well, so whichever lands first settles it. Whether it was retried is a question for the chain rather than for this log.
The chain shows the maker's payment still sitting in its contract: neither claimed nor refunded. The maker had already collected the taker's payment by this step, so the taker paid and has not received the maker's coin. The secret is public, so the taker's claim can still be made; the timelock expired 2025-12-23 23:50:16 UTC, so the maker can take it back now. Checked 2026-11-06 04:45:47 UTC. It will be asked again.
Wondering whether this one is yours? SwapScope cannot tell you: the parties are salted hashes, so that nobody can test a key against this data, and that cuts both ways. Search this swap's uuid in your own wallet's swap history, or open the payment transaction above on a block explorer and see whether the address paying into it is one of yours.
0aae23e8fd2d455bdde5a31796cec19d2463a04eac838947c9886189bc05a957
Both payments are on their chains and locked to the same secret hash b3c9e61bbbcfe542dbfa3355b0ca8b6966f349b2, and a preimage hashing to it was published on chain when one side claimed.
- MakerPaymentReceived · MakerPaymentSent: 0aae23e8fd2d455bdde5a31796cec19d2463a04eac838947c9886189bc05a957
2e8cc3821cc47f45696d104fc60cbba654fd65707ec4e4f1c1e17269b4a35641
Both payments are on their chains and locked to the same secret hash b3c9e61bbbcfe542dbfa3355b0ca8b6966f349b2, and a preimage hashing to it was published on chain when one side claimed.
- TakerFeeSent · TakerFeeValidated: a3a138db83b5367538edb3e8ec91869a16b29baea042d093328eba588be62594
- TakerPaymentSent · TakerPaymentReceived: 2e8cc3821cc47f45696d104fc60cbba654fd65707ec4e4f1c1e17269b4a35641
- TakerPaymentSpent: 6e5cead553cffa25cd4c5a04f80a6da58d965f20bdb3b8db3656d9bf905bf81c
No flags are stored against this swap. Flags are written while a swap sits inside a live pricing window, so on an older swap their absence means it was never assessed rather than that it was assessed and found clean.
Reported by defistats-gleec.