DGB/LTC · swap

40a93a71-319e-45c6-bb77-fc4afd65dfb8

Sell · 2026-09-12 21:52:31 UTC ·

What was traded
Price0.000084820174 LTC
DGB amount595.8674
LTC amount0.05054
≈ USD$2.72
outside the lookback window
How long it took
Started2026-09-12 21:52:29 UTC
Finished2026-09-13 02:13:57 UTC
Took4h 21m
11m 16s

This one took about 23.2× the usual for DGB/LTC. Waiting longer than usual is not in itself a failure: a swap waits on confirmations from both chains, and a slow block or a busy network stretches it.

The final claim did not go through on the first attempt

The record stops at MakerPaymentSpendConfirmFailed. The taker's claim on the maker's coin was broadcast but not seen to confirm.

taker_swap:2052] !wait for maker payment spend confirmations: rpc_clients:119] Waited too long until 1789261448 for transaction to be confirmed 2 times

By this step both payments were on their chains and the price had been struck, so the trade counts toward the reference price. The claim can still be made for as long as the payment is unspent, and since the timelock has passed the payer can take it back as well, so whichever lands first settles it. Whether it was retried is a question for the chain rather than for this log.

The chain says the claim landed: the payment was spent with the preimage, in 8d15e7f64e297cb6a641395865471129b5c8b3e2bb6b3d85756a517e40ebcb24. Checked 2026-09-24 01:46:09 UTC.

On-chain evidence
✓✓✓maker leg · LTC-segwitfrom the swap record

75d3c017943f233b7baee5012c409120c7dc130ad7210812e45c33f8bc05d422

Both payments are on their chains and locked to the same secret hash 3125df5db684b21131ec40c77e95611a92f94fcc, and a preimage hashing to it was published on chain when one side claimed.

  • MakerPaymentReceived · MakerPaymentSent: 75d3c017943f233b7baee5012c409120c7dc130ad7210812e45c33f8bc05d422
  • MakerPaymentSpent: 8d15e7f64e297cb6a641395865471129b5c8b3e2bb6b3d85756a517e40ebcb24
✓✓✓taker leg · DGB-segwitfrom the swap record

6c498f486b9f90be210613f84cd9dc71154920c79d872010348e9644733f27dc

Both payments are on their chains and locked to the same secret hash 3125df5db684b21131ec40c77e95611a92f94fcc, and a preimage hashing to it was published on chain when one side claimed.

  • TakerFeeSent · TakerFeeValidated: 1bd2b262268e5285cf39bb3c17bd37b82c70ef6149fbfcbffbd00cec6395da6a
  • TakerPaymentSent · TakerPaymentReceived: 6c498f486b9f90be210613f84cd9dc71154920c79d872010348e9644733f27dc
  • TakerPaymentSpent: 47bf14e0933ddfa169fd8a7f482780b6102dac13b297bbef7d0515e7555188d2
Who traded
07699623
Takerunknown
Maker clientmympm
Taker client
Versions3.0.0-beta_df8d86b · 3.1.0-beta_f3efd2c
Flags

No flags are stored against this swap. Flags are written while a swap sits inside a live pricing window, so on an older swap their absence means it was never assessed rather than that it was assessed and found clean.

Reported by defistats-gleec.