This one took about 29.2× the usual for FIRO/BCH. Waiting longer than usual is not in itself a failure: a swap waits on confirmations from both chains, and a slow block or a busy network stretches it.
The record stops at MakerPaymentSpendConfirmFailed. The taker's claim on the maker's coin was broadcast but not seen to confirm.
taker_swap:2052] !wait for maker payment spend confirmations: rpc_clients:119] Waited too long until 1789777578 for transaction to be confirmed 1 times
By this step both payments were on their chains and the price had been struck, so the trade counts toward the reference price. The claim can be retried for as long as the timelock holds, and whether it was is a question for the chain rather than for this log.
The chain says the claim landed: the payment was spent with the preimage, in 8afdd67e15375cdc4ef907f7da0d673d13de8f33a2126e46d58ab7908c96730f. Checked 2026-09-22 12:35:32 UTC.
7f511cb696d937a181bb0043974a41a55b7831418da707fccbbc7ae5e5571cd2
Both payments are on their chains and locked to the same secret hash 99324e85d40c5adcce4829e750dc1688ac07e115, and a preimage hashing to it was published on chain when one side claimed.
- MakerPaymentSent · 7f511cb696d937a181bb0043974a41a55b7831418da707fccbbc7ae5e5571cd2
5d01436c5c8c3428e613be6239d82112997e86b14bda27f430b668c8efe19cf7
Both payments are on their chains and locked to the same secret hash 99324e85d40c5adcce4829e750dc1688ac07e115, and a preimage hashing to it was published on chain when one side claimed.
- TakerFeeValidated · eb96d3a1692e066bedeb3162eb1be2d051847e23cad7a75a2145a2a2d76795e8
- TakerPaymentReceived · 5d01436c5c8c3428e613be6239d82112997e86b14bda27f430b668c8efe19cf7
- TakerPaymentSpent · 262a522ac6bd54207e50cd69b48d45797fd6b26d381df3845c497b19cd89a89d
No anomalies were recorded against this swap.
Reported by defistats-gleec.