This one took about 44.3× the usual for FIRO/LTC. Waiting longer than usual is not in itself a failure: a swap waits on confirmations from both chains, and a slow block or a busy network stretches it.
The record stops at MakerPaymentSpendConfirmFailed. The taker's claim on the maker's coin was broadcast but not seen to confirm.
taker_swap:2052] !wait for maker payment spend confirmations: rpc_clients:119] Waited too long until 1788620546 for transaction to be confirmed 1 times
By this step both payments were on their chains and the price had been struck, so the trade counts toward the reference price. The claim can be retried for as long as the timelock holds, and whether it was is a question for the chain rather than for this log.
The chain says the claim landed: the payment was spent with the preimage, in 9221cff92bb8435dd69cbb85bba344fb9cdad77aa1c9672d89f3aa8a6f6ad072. Checked 2026-09-22 12:35:47 UTC.
a3dca97967c9ac658992508f762e43e71ef63ad57e47d707de61904fb3faec4a
Both payments are on their chains and locked to the same secret hash f67cde61cfdb2bb74a3e3dbd63ef9747df566c28, and a preimage hashing to it was published on chain when one side claimed.
- MakerPaymentSent · a3dca97967c9ac658992508f762e43e71ef63ad57e47d707de61904fb3faec4a
77f6c2eca0ed67e1db5fdda56a7ab10d2d56dd5ba25a44d094e14ba9dbeee5c2
Both payments are on their chains and locked to the same secret hash f67cde61cfdb2bb74a3e3dbd63ef9747df566c28, and a preimage hashing to it was published on chain when one side claimed.
- TakerFeeValidated · 3e1cc2eb8166ef140cf8dc81e68aa3433954f1d2afe85478715571c095c2dc99
- TakerPaymentReceived · 77f6c2eca0ed67e1db5fdda56a7ab10d2d56dd5ba25a44d094e14ba9dbeee5c2
- TakerPaymentSpent · 95027806076a1069f6db4c70a0e7d9bed501a3254d17575634665babd1c6a68c
No anomalies were recorded against this swap.
Reported by defistats-gleec.