This one took about 17.0× the usual for LBC/RVN. Waiting longer than usual is not in itself a failure: a swap waits on confirmations from both chains, and a slow block or a busy network stretches it.
The record stops at MakerPaymentSpendConfirmFailed. The taker's claim on the maker's coin was broadcast but not seen to confirm.
taker_swap:2052] !wait for maker payment spend confirmations: rpc_clients:119] Waited too long until 1789114507 for transaction to be confirmed 1 times
By this step both payments were on their chains and the price had been struck, so the trade counts toward the reference price. The claim can be retried for as long as the timelock holds, and whether it was is a question for the chain rather than for this log.
The chain says the claim landed: the payment was spent with the preimage, in b2de7d86f404640cb6fb6834d085503d2fafec9fce13037df282a6545a1b4de3. Checked 2026-09-22 12:35:37 UTC.
934ab00e95a93adb60806664fff5b9e29fb02eec4927b25a18f9c462395ba13f
Both payments are on their chains and locked to the same secret hash cd774346d08e21c8b3694b6803f2d9c70f16b179, and a preimage hashing to it was published on chain when one side claimed.
- MakerPaymentSent · 934ab00e95a93adb60806664fff5b9e29fb02eec4927b25a18f9c462395ba13f
9667682c201c2263fc4f9b4953728de1caf740a35e6b574ca521ff14fca7cec1
Both payments are on their chains and locked to the same secret hash cd774346d08e21c8b3694b6803f2d9c70f16b179, and a preimage hashing to it was published on chain when one side claimed.
- TakerFeeValidated · bbffc0402bc024fba0b7aca45c4b64cfcde3d2d27d122ebfb22d94ea0937a46d
- TakerPaymentReceived · 9667682c201c2263fc4f9b4953728de1caf740a35e6b574ca521ff14fca7cec1
- TakerPaymentSpent · 7ece82285eaff50e83df41e3e7afa0509b76b127f8d8537e9832f6860e429c45
No anomalies were recorded against this swap.
Reported by defistats-gleec.