This one took about 11.3× the usual for KMDCL/LCC. Waiting longer than usual is not in itself a failure: a swap waits on confirmations from both chains, and a slow block or a busy network stretches it.
The record stops at MakerPaymentSpendConfirmFailed. The taker's claim on the maker's coin was broadcast but not seen to confirm.
taker_swap:2052] !wait for maker payment spend confirmations: rpc_clients:119] Waited too long until 1788755634 for transaction to be confirmed 1 times
By this step both payments were on their chains and the price had been struck, so the trade counts toward the reference price. The claim can be retried for as long as the timelock holds, and whether it was is a question for the chain rather than for this log.
The chain says the claim landed: the payment was spent with the preimage, in 1efea4d2b4b23572cf04cdc3901df699314beef776e99ef7f773c10fc32b0313. Checked 2026-09-22 12:35:40 UTC.
b9972af222479c4713778b6431d37dcd58be8f787a9be4b4803245de1b6baf98
Both payments are on their chains and locked to the same secret hash 6ad36784926a3738f0afb9136d75a1d6f446d032, and a preimage hashing to it was published on chain when one side claimed.
- MakerPaymentSent · b9972af222479c4713778b6431d37dcd58be8f787a9be4b4803245de1b6baf98
8dd19256cc5bc033868c3f1a560986d7487ad03d563d95da4c465f22e53eb2fa
Both payments are on their chains and locked to the same secret hash 6ad36784926a3738f0afb9136d75a1d6f446d032, and a preimage hashing to it was published on chain when one side claimed.
- TakerFeeValidated · c0cb6efdf66239153ea3f2e678cf96cc640ddc40d0b6a9f6983db300a5bca0ee
- TakerPaymentReceived · 8dd19256cc5bc033868c3f1a560986d7487ad03d563d95da4c465f22e53eb2fa
- TakerPaymentSpent · e840f0a2aeae5a3bfe6da254ea18fb40f8220bd9f475eb0c1e6ff1812ead3e81
No anomalies were recorded against this swap.
Reported by defistats-gleec.