This one took about 44.4× the usual for FIRO/LTC. Waiting longer than usual is not in itself a failure: a swap waits on confirmations from both chains, and a slow block or a busy network stretches it.
The record stops at MakerPaymentSpendConfirmFailed. The taker's claim on the maker's coin was broadcast but not seen to confirm.
taker_swap:2052] !wait for maker payment spend confirmations: rpc_clients:119] Waited too long until 1788620498 for transaction to be confirmed 1 times
By this step both payments were on their chains and the price had been struck, so the trade counts toward the reference price. The claim can be retried for as long as the timelock holds, and whether it was is a question for the chain rather than for this log.
The chain says the claim landed: the payment was spent with the preimage, in e7ccb583a41c920fcee3a9385879efb0b43d816e9c1fb847cea3bf65512abb62. Checked 2026-09-22 12:35:48 UTC.
e6ca3bdb9d30700f6b1530bd9ba516a55a3b3d09f7236308f6bf098632adf214
Both payments are on their chains and locked to the same secret hash 84ea2036a8d79f4d809bbdcd68d8d4ce43eb1df5, and a preimage hashing to it was published on chain when one side claimed.
- MakerPaymentSent · e6ca3bdb9d30700f6b1530bd9ba516a55a3b3d09f7236308f6bf098632adf214
af2f47e1fd8762181db8e043a3bf0b0cf8c6c3f52d32a245d985af7f593e2c55
Both payments are on their chains and locked to the same secret hash 84ea2036a8d79f4d809bbdcd68d8d4ce43eb1df5, and a preimage hashing to it was published on chain when one side claimed.
- TakerFeeValidated · 7679d1175768385c77f1f0084bb476063174b3684ffbda02092c5ba875bf4102
- TakerPaymentReceived · af2f47e1fd8762181db8e043a3bf0b0cf8c6c3f52d32a245d985af7f593e2c55
- TakerPaymentSpent · 6e44b4d4aabbf6c4f73fd9fb76407f40164b1e744186e16edbcb626820d21547
No anomalies were recorded against this swap.
Reported by defistats-gleec.