This one took about 11.3× the usual for KMDCL/LCC. Waiting longer than usual is not in itself a failure: a swap waits on confirmations from both chains, and a slow block or a busy network stretches it.
The record stops at MakerPaymentSpendConfirmFailed. The taker's claim on the maker's coin was broadcast but not seen to confirm.
taker_swap:2052] !wait for maker payment spend confirmations: rpc_clients:119] Waited too long until 1788755649 for transaction to be confirmed 1 times
By this step both payments were on their chains and the price had been struck, so the trade counts toward the reference price. The claim can be retried for as long as the timelock holds, and whether it was is a question for the chain rather than for this log.
The chain says the claim landed: the payment was spent with the preimage, in dda86ac9eb3847fd7edb43f6f1476574c3f6465b0d3b0b22ad6c8eb0d454bd0d. Checked 2026-09-22 12:35:40 UTC.
0fb7254cd0d87074d706fbbf594d6d6405591bdc22a751ab91f41663ff08467c
Both payments are on their chains and locked to the same secret hash c0da4bb976d8981c3e92373504d40547cdb59322, and a preimage hashing to it was published on chain when one side claimed.
- MakerPaymentSent · 0fb7254cd0d87074d706fbbf594d6d6405591bdc22a751ab91f41663ff08467c
5db1424be735b473fecd1938ea68f36898ba7c10a5a7b94a4bbdf45c7d0ae56d
Both payments are on their chains and locked to the same secret hash c0da4bb976d8981c3e92373504d40547cdb59322, and a preimage hashing to it was published on chain when one side claimed.
- TakerFeeValidated · fea360086d9856b828af5b0a97267961ad367af1b50b2bab464229e878d6e45d
- TakerPaymentReceived · 5db1424be735b473fecd1938ea68f36898ba7c10a5a7b94a4bbdf45c7d0ae56d
- TakerPaymentSpent · 18a83e9ce7f6805066cd643a0f2e28fb1ee708126b174f18cd56b4afd0327a85
No anomalies were recorded against this swap.
Reported by defistats-gleec.