CHTA/DOGE · swap

4d5da3a2-827a-4862-8f19-8eadd0e45d27

Sell · 2026-02-26 06:28:27 UTC ·

What was traded
Price0.0000091718986 DOGE
CHTA amount61,187
DOGE amount0.5612
≈ USD
not evaluated
How long it took
Started2026-02-26 06:28:25 UTC
Finished2026-02-26 10:32:21 UTC
Took4h 03m

An atomic swap is not instant by design. Each side has to publish a transaction and wait for the other chain to confirm it, so the time it takes is set mostly by the block spacing of the two chains involved rather than by anything either party does.

The final claim did not go through on the first attempt

The record stops at MakerPaymentSpendConfirmFailed. The taker's claim on the maker's coin was broadcast but not seen to confirm.

taker_swap:2050] !wait for maker payment spend confirmations: rpc_clients:119] Waited too long until 1772098805 for transaction to be confirmed 2 times

By this step both payments were on their chains and the price had been struck, so the trade counts toward the reference price. The claim can be retried for as long as the timelock holds, and whether it was is a question for the chain rather than for this log.

The chain says the claim landed: the payment was spent with the preimage, in bc8196e5f2e0f693ac2391e02194b23ae24a283e687c42582e8f9e7cbb7f7c7f. Checked 2026-09-22 12:41:56 UTC.

On-chain evidence
✓✓✓maker leg · DOGEfrom the swap record

5b432dfd02e7fbf62a0ee1f97141feda88485fdf5f4feae7c12840a8511b57b6

Both payments are on their chains and locked to the same secret hash 9731ecdc75e8508e4d9c572b3442a5adf85ee8e6, and a preimage hashing to it was published on chain when one side claimed.

  • MakerPaymentSent · 5b432dfd02e7fbf62a0ee1f97141feda88485fdf5f4feae7c12840a8511b57b6
  • MakerPaymentReceived · 5b432dfd02e7fbf62a0ee1f97141feda88485fdf5f4feae7c12840a8511b57b6
  • MakerPaymentSpentByWatcher · bc8196e5f2e0f693ac2391e02194b23ae24a283e687c42582e8f9e7cbb7f7c7f
✓✓✓taker leg · CHTAfrom the swap record

e89970f0bb7412c4cb624d56a7b7e701ac29d4289424025ccfd6d5c4ceb93f09

Both payments are on their chains and locked to the same secret hash 9731ecdc75e8508e4d9c572b3442a5adf85ee8e6, and a preimage hashing to it was published on chain when one side claimed.

  • TakerFeeValidated · ef3df4fba1ad866eed02fa92a87df12443e4ea626ac20ce9fa01266198cf052d
  • TakerPaymentReceived · e89970f0bb7412c4cb624d56a7b7e701ac29d4289424025ccfd6d5c4ceb93f09
  • TakerPaymentSpent · 0f132e283e499387e90a2a770fbbc749819e201244af9a94ea7f7c08468f534c
  • TakerFeeSent · ef3df4fba1ad866eed02fa92a87df12443e4ea626ac20ce9fa01266198cf052d
  • TakerPaymentSent · e89970f0bb7412c4cb624d56a7b7e701ac29d4289424025ccfd6d5c4ceb93f09
Who traded
616be328
Takerunknown
Maker clientmympm
Taker client
Versions2.6.0-beta_02a8a3c
Flags

No anomalies were recorded against this swap.

Reported by defistats-gleec.