This one took about 11.3× the usual for KMDCL/LCC. Waiting longer than usual is not in itself a failure: a swap waits on confirmations from both chains, and a slow block or a busy network stretches it.
The record stops at MakerPaymentSpendConfirmFailed. The taker's claim on the maker's coin was broadcast but not seen to confirm.
taker_swap:2052] !wait for maker payment spend confirmations: rpc_clients:119] Waited too long until 1788755665 for transaction to be confirmed 1 times
By this step both payments were on their chains and the price had been struck, so the trade counts toward the reference price. The claim can be retried for as long as the timelock holds, and whether it was is a question for the chain rather than for this log.
The chain says the claim landed: the payment was spent with the preimage, in b3cebca4c8c288f3d03ce15011d9056d19063471de069decda6df384b1db3103. Checked 2026-09-22 12:35:40 UTC.
b9e5aa369539b6b45d502946cf840665945000a87ba40eab8c1d9e98d8ce8b79
Both payments are on their chains and locked to the same secret hash a6fae8a8c31dc5e64f6669aa95b62f83166ab92f, and a preimage hashing to it was published on chain when one side claimed.
- MakerPaymentSent · b9e5aa369539b6b45d502946cf840665945000a87ba40eab8c1d9e98d8ce8b79
6025c930cc0917e0deb21b95e2f08d45f6a0cc39fbe7ca34a38856c9a2521b7f
Both payments are on their chains and locked to the same secret hash a6fae8a8c31dc5e64f6669aa95b62f83166ab92f, and a preimage hashing to it was published on chain when one side claimed.
- TakerFeeValidated · 49b66649a3fb3ea2147c30130d98fbc3d8bf830c0bc5f613f781494d24063b17
- TakerPaymentReceived · 6025c930cc0917e0deb21b95e2f08d45f6a0cc39fbe7ca34a38856c9a2521b7f
- TakerPaymentSpent · 064081fe6ef65fb2289ae36ceae6e3029ef5dc1a3d245d094136d462d3a0e753
No anomalies were recorded against this swap.
Reported by defistats-gleec.