This one took about 44.4× the usual for RVN/DGB. Waiting longer than usual is not in itself a failure: a swap waits on confirmations from both chains, and a slow block or a busy network stretches it.
The record stops at MakerPaymentSpendConfirmFailed. The taker's claim on the maker's coin was broadcast but not seen to confirm.
taker_swap:2052] !wait for maker payment spend confirmations: rpc_clients:119] Waited too long until 1783149882 for transaction to be confirmed 1 times
By this step both payments were on their chains and the price had been struck, so the trade counts toward the reference price. The claim can be retried for as long as the timelock holds, and whether it was is a question for the chain rather than for this log.
The chain says the claim landed: the payment was spent with the preimage, in f9b8677fed30a938644fa0ee3211a9e6dd35e816e921b5f0b136a753acd80503. Checked 2026-09-22 12:38:47 UTC.
a0a1602b213460ea173e27a0222ec4d9bfd21ddd979cdcdf807af75c685e972f
Both payments are on their chains and locked to the same secret hash 5367af12d75a6c872aa06d69c115e45d6cd94ed8, and a preimage hashing to it was published on chain when one side claimed.
- MakerPaymentSent · a0a1602b213460ea173e27a0222ec4d9bfd21ddd979cdcdf807af75c685e972f
36c3a61d43dc3347c3e7d855793ec230c85f5a116c1a44f60271d422a593d739
Both payments are on their chains and locked to the same secret hash 5367af12d75a6c872aa06d69c115e45d6cd94ed8, and a preimage hashing to it was published on chain when one side claimed.
- TakerFeeValidated · f0e00cb9b9ed119f1b39bd09ea2fcf0b12b07cc523108aae72c8572f4138d01f
- TakerPaymentReceived · 36c3a61d43dc3347c3e7d855793ec230c85f5a116c1a44f60271d422a593d739
- TakerPaymentSpent · 8d19ead78cd8eb7db9c721db7d3a391fb6b01d96e636cb0496d794278dccfa49
No anomalies were recorded against this swap.
Reported by defistats-gleec.