This one took about 23.7× the usual for BTCZ/LTC. Waiting longer than usual is not in itself a failure: a swap waits on confirmations from both chains, and a slow block or a busy network stretches it.
The record stops at MakerPaymentSpendConfirmFailed. The taker's claim on the maker's coin was broadcast but not seen to confirm.
taker_swap:2052] !wait for maker payment spend confirmations: rpc_clients:119] Waited too long until 1785169583 for transaction to be confirmed 1 times
By this step both payments were on their chains and the price had been struck, so the trade counts toward the reference price. The claim can be retried for as long as the timelock holds, and whether it was is a question for the chain rather than for this log.
The chain says the claim landed: the payment was spent with the preimage, in 53a69c6d4517df3a5579ffbed5926a31aa5f6a161316808b664f41b532293d01. Checked 2026-09-22 12:37:54 UTC.
5766ada32af76945eb24696cc146cb64d19dffb1a8f6049fd266d587ff4d0284
Both payments are on their chains and locked to the same secret hash c8b979d8fe86dc247a3b6c61709705178655dc01, and a preimage hashing to it was published on chain when one side claimed.
- MakerPaymentSent · 5766ada32af76945eb24696cc146cb64d19dffb1a8f6049fd266d587ff4d0284
52c0544b5ddf83b5681b29f5f85ebb5fb29ca7a8ac1f47efbcbb2cab71b19d87
Both payments are on their chains and locked to the same secret hash c8b979d8fe86dc247a3b6c61709705178655dc01, and a preimage hashing to it was published on chain when one side claimed.
- TakerFeeValidated · 31c1bb140fab6b916a7b1ba467d4398e16c4a89582035f744074f3c07489609b
- TakerPaymentReceived · 52c0544b5ddf83b5681b29f5f85ebb5fb29ca7a8ac1f47efbcbb2cab71b19d87
- TakerPaymentSpent · 617a7162ccf22e3b15ec4388035fc733ac580866cd40537f405b8aac40564b10
No anomalies were recorded against this swap.
Reported by defistats-gleec.